Langdock Alternative 2026
Lurus vs Langdock
Which AI platform fits your team?
Lurus and Langdock both address companies that want to use AI securely across teams. This comparison reviews provider structure, pricing, models, privacy, and workflows based on publicly available sources — without blanket compliance claims.
Lurus and Langdock compared
Provider structure, pricing, privacy, and models — based on publicly available sources.
The key differences
Where Lurus and Langdock differ
Four points that, from our perspective, matter most in this comparison — depending on your requirements.
Provider and legal structure
According to its imprint, Langdock is provided by Langdock GmbH based in Berlin. According to the shareholder list in the German commercial register (HRB 254499, Amtsgericht Charlottenburg), Langdock GmbH is 100% owned by Langdock Inc. based in Delaware, USA. Customers should assess the relevance of this control structure against their own compliance requirements. Lurus is a German company operated from Germany.
Pricing structure in a team scenario
For small and medium-sized teams, the entry point matters most: Lurus offers a free plan and a Team plan from €29/month for 5 users. According to its public pricing page, Langdock prices by seats and add-ons. Whether Lurus is more attractive in a concrete case depends on seat count, workflows, model usage, and billing period.
Zero Data Retention and No Training
Lurus relies on Zero Data Retention by default and on the requirement that customer data is not used to train AI models. This is especially relevant for organizations working with confidential or sensitive information.
Frontier and open-source models
Lurus combines leading frontier models such as GPT, Claude, and Gemini with strong open-source models. This lets teams choose between maximum model capability and particularly cost-efficient usage depending on the task.
Key checks before deciding
Evaluate both platforms against concrete requirements rather than isolated features.
Models & regions
Which models run in which regions and with which no-training/retention commitments?
Teams & roles
How are roles, permissions, approvals, audit requirements, and admin processes implemented?
Workflows
Do you need simple assistants, tool integrations, or larger automation packages?
Cost model
Always compare concrete scenarios instead of isolated list prices.
Transparency
Sources and source date
This page uses publicly available information, including the shareholder list in the German commercial register and an analysis by Steiger Legal. It is not legal advice and does not make a blanket compliance assessment. Pricing, packages, ownership, and compliance statements may change.
- Source date: 05.07.2026
- Register: Shareholder list in the German commercial register: Langdock GmbH, HRB 254499, Amtsgericht Charlottenburg (Berlin), list dated 2023-06-14
- Langdock Pricing Langdock Imprint / Legal Notice Langdock Security Steiger Legal: Is Langdock under American control?
Frequently asked questions
Is Lurus an alternative to Langdock? +
Yes. Lurus can be an alternative to Langdock for teams that prioritize multi-model access, privacy-oriented processing, local storage, simple team management, and transparent model costs. The right choice depends on the specific use case.
Which Langdock prices are considered? +
We considered publicly available information from Langdock’s pricing page: Business Standard from €23.20 per user/month, Business Max at €99.00 per user/month, and the Workflows Business add-on at €449.00 per workspace/month. Source date: 2026-07-05, excluding VAT according to the source.
Does Lurus assess Langdock’s GDPR compliance? +
No. This page is not legal advice and does not make a blanket compliance assessment. We reference publicly available information and recommend reviewing privacy terms, DPA, subprocessors, and concrete data flows individually.
Who is Lurus best suited for? +
Lurus is suited for companies that want to combine German provider structure, Zero Data Retention, No Training requirements, flexible model choice, and cost-efficient usage in one lean platform.
What are the advantages and disadvantages compared with Langdock? +
From our perspective, the most relevant differences are provider and control structure, entry price in the described team scenario, Zero Data Retention by default, No Training requirements, and the combination of frontier models with strong open-source models. Which points matter most depends on compliance requirements, data categories, team size, and usage profile.
Evaluate Lurus for your team
Start for free or talk to us about privacy, models, workflows, and team rollout.